EMAIL: info@okeno-ip.jp
No. 067; Section 4-1-11: confusing similarity;
stylized “bohem” v. “BOHÈME”;
Opposition No. 2013-900345
(March 26, 2014)
Bottom line: The Board found that stylized “bohem” is not confusingly similar to
“BOHÈME”.
An individual filed a
trademark application for stylized “bohem” shown below designating personal
ornaments [jewelry], etc. in Class 14 and brooches for clothing, insignias for
wear [not of precious metal], etc. in Class 26, which was registered without
examiner’s refusal. Montblanc Simplo
GmbH filed an opposition against the registration on the ground that the opposed
mark is confusingly similar to its own prior mark “BOHÉME” covering identical
goods in Class 14.
<Opposed
mark>
The Board observed
the marks at issue and found as follows:
<As for the
opposed mark>
- From the fact that
an English word “Bohemian” is pronounced [bo-he-mi-a-n], “bohem” will be
pronounced [bo-he-mu], and “bohem” has no particular
meaning.
- The opponent argued
that the sound of the mark is [bo-e-mu].
However, the Board found the argument is not reasonable, because it is
uncommon that “h” is silent in English-wise pronunciation.
<As for the cited
mark>
- “BOHÈME” is
pronounced [bo-e-mu] as it has an accent grave on the first “E”. “BOHÈME” has no particular
meaning.
- The opponent argued
that “BOHÈME” may also be pronounced [bo-he-mu] citing one blog article,
in which “BOHÈME” was transliterated to [bo-he-mu] in katakana. However, the Board did not take it sufficient
to confirm that “BOHÈME” is pronounced [bo-he-mu].
<Comparison>
- In conclusion, the
marks are not confusingly similar to each other.
Dojima NS Bldg. 3F, 2-1-18, Dojima
Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0003 Japan
TEL: +81-6-6343-8401
FAX: +81-6-6343-8402
Email: info@okeno-ip.jp